Introduction.
James Dodson
SALUTATION.
To the candid Christian Reader
Grace be with you, mercy and peace from
God the Father, and from the Lord
Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father
in truth and love.
INTRODUCTION.
IN sending this work abroad, the author is aware that it is a contested subject. He is also sensible that in this age, controversy is, with many, rather unfashionable. It is particularly to be regretted that defence of ancient truth, principle and order seems to be especially decried.
The religious world has been, for a long time in a revolutionary state, and although factions multiply, animosities do, in some measure seem to subside. This must certainly be pleasing to all the lovers of peace. It is, however, very natural for society to oscillate between extremes.
The social orb has been for a considerable time in the cold regions of the north. Scepticism and indifference about principle have succeeded to blind zeal and bloody persecution.
Those who used, while power was in their hands, to be most active in such work are now the most noisy advocates of forbearance, moderation and charity. This they need not do, to dull the edge of the sword, or quench the violence of the flame, which they used to wield and kindle, but they wish to ward off, thereby, the spiritual weapons which the advocates of truth and scriptural order use against their crazy systems.
This is improper, unfair and cowardly. The best time to adjust differences among parties is a time of peace. We do not need, however, to charge the Baptist brethren with these extremes. They have never persecuted; they have never been remiss. They have generally manifested a zeal worthy of a good cause in promoting the interest of their society and in propagating the peculiar tenets of their sect. For this they deserve credit. Let everyone be fully persuaded in his own mind; and whatever any man’s hand finds to do, let him do it with all his might. If they are wrong, I do not justify them for that; but if they are right, they ought to be zealous against all others who must on that supposition be radically and fundamentally wrong.
If they are mistaken, and yet think themselves exclusively correct, they are consistent in using all their zeal and strength in vindicating the supposed truth and order which they defend. At all events it must be considered a matter of sufficient magnitude to engage the attention of all the friends of truth, propriety and peace. It is the importance of the subject, christian and candid reader, that justifies my appearance at your bar. The cause which I plead is the cause of the poor defenceless children of credible believers. They come into the world naked as well as others, and need as well as others, regeneration. Natural descent from christian parents does not communicate to them sanctifying grace. Still if the great Redeemer & Ruler of the Church has ordained that they shall be covered with the skirt of parental representation, and be dandled on the knees of the church in infancy, you will not count me a disturber of your repose while I plead their cause.
In pleading this too, if it appears that the covenant charter really makes such provision for the infants of such as are members of the visible church that they are to be baptised: then I shall be pleading the cause not only of babes, but also of God. If he really has ordained that children be members of the visible church by the representation of their parents; it is certainly indignant treatment of Him to say that they shall not.
The advocates upon the other side of the controversy must give me credit for honesty of intention—for vindicating ancient claims—and the cause of mercy. They cannot say that I have undertaken this suit by the misrepresentation or high fees of my infant clients. No, poor things, they are mute, and if concerned, it is about something else than their great birth-right. To this it is true they have no right upon the footing of the covenant of works. By this, on the, contrary, misery and death have devolved upon all the apostate family. Hence we see those who have not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, i.e. who have not actually sinned are liable to death. We do, however humbly presume that our great Saviour, has in his clemency and mercy revealed a covenant, whereby he may yet have a holy nation; a godly seed. The baptism of infants is not regeneration: nor does it avail to the purifying of the flesh. Yet we hope, by divide aid, to prove that it may be to well informed parents the answer of a good conscience towards God. It is particularly to be desired that this controversy should be fairly settled, in order that one great obstacle may be removed which stands in the way of a general union among professors. There are several causes of present existing divisions, which, it is easy to see, may vanish without any particular determination, which of the parties is now correct. Some view in the general diffusion of evangelical light may be so clear, absorbing and effulgent, that the parties may readily and amicably drop the dispute about those which were previously peculiar. Like mariners and wanderers, who in the dark night dispute about stars, glimmering through the clouds, or lights occasionally gleaming through the hazy way, when the rolling sun arises in his purple majesty in the east, the controversy ends.
But this cannot be the case in this dispute. Either the infants of professors must be considered as having, or not having, a right to membership in the Church, or there can be no Millennial union. As the members of the church of Christ are all not only made of, but also redeemed by one blood, inhabited by one Spirit, and travelling to one heavenly country, it would certainly be agreeable to all of that community that they should see eye to eye in the great doctrines and duties of religion, and speak with the voice together in a harmonious, holy and united profession.
There is really but one Lord, one faith and one baptism. Why then are professors not visibly and formally united? Why do the subjects of one Lord quarrel? Why do the heirs of like precious faith disagree about forms? Bodily exercise profiteth little: Godliness is profitable unto all things, having the promise of the life that now is and of that which is to come. Still it must be admitted that the best way to obtain unity in principle and uniformity in practice is to adhere closely and strictly to divine institution. “To the law and to the testimony. If they speak not according to the word it is because there is no light in them.” Isa. viii. 20. Can two walk together except they be agreed. Amos iii. 3. What Christ has considered of sufficient importance to reveal, we should not rashly call indifferent to believe and profess—what he has commanded, we ought unquestionably to observe and do. If Episcopalians, Congregationalists and Presbyterians have no authority for baptising infants, they ought candidly to confess their error and desist from their unauthorised practice. Better to reform than be always wrong, and the sooner reformation is effected the more honorable and the more advantageous. If they have authority, it is certainly due to the Baptist brethren that these other denominations should exhibit their authority, and render a reason for their hope. i.e. If children are included in the new covenant charter, of which baptism is the visible initiatory seal, let the evidence thereof be produced, and let all concerned give unprejudiced attention.
That this subject may have a fair hearing is the design of the following plea; and that it may tend, by the blessing of God, to edify Christians and unite the Churches is the sincere desire and fervent prayer of
THE AUTHOR