Use the form on the right to contact us.
You can edit the text in this area, and change where the contact form on the right submits to, by entering edit mode using the modes on the bottom right.
123 Street Avenue, City Town, 99999
(123) 555-6789
email@address.com
You can set your address, phone number, email and site description in the settings tab.
Link to read me page with more information.
1687-James Renwick and Alexander Shields.-This is an extensive apologetic for the course of act taken by the United Societies during the latter end of the Killing Times. It explains their beliefs and their actions in the face of the prevailing currents of apostasy and the vicious persecution that ensued on the covenant keepers.
Read More1684-The United Societies.-In this declaration, the Covenanters complain of their mistreat by the civil authorities and the plead the unjust of this persecution together with a statement that they will engage in self defense.
Read More1685-The United Societies.-A declaration that takes up the position of the Covenanters on certain confessional matters regarding allegiance to a king that is a covenant-breaker. It includes a very strong object to the reception of James II.
Read More1791-Thomas Henderson (1757-1823).-In this introductory material, Mr. Henderson rehearses the history and contendings, including defections, between the Revolution establishment, in 1688, and the first of the Declarations following, in 1692.
Read More1692-The United Societies.-In this early declaration, the covenanting Societies lament the defection of the three ministers (Shields, Linning and Boyd) into the Revolution church but they pledge to maintain the cause of covenanted reformation to the best of their ability.
Read More1695-The United Societies.-This paper decries the wicked confederacies and lamentable defections that had become wide spread in the Church of Scotland contrary to their covenant engagements.
Read More1835-William B. Sprague (1795-1876).-This is the sermon in which Sprague first attacks the temperance movement and its fanatical adherents who sought the removal of wine from the Lord's supper.
Read More1835-William B. Sprague (1795-1876).-In this letter, Sprague responds to Moses Stuart, a professor at Andover Seminary, who objected to his sermon on religious fanaticism which demanded the use of wine, not grape juice, be retained in the Lord's supper. Sprague attacks the fanatical impulse and its undermining of the sacrament.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-A short preface explaining the purpose and scope of this work.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-Dodds begins by pointing out the grammatical errors and the pretentiousness of the style of Morton's writing on this subject.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-In this chapter, Dodds raises a few questions about the spirit in which Morton conducts his critique of Pressly including an examination of who is more circumspect in their Christian walk, general Presbyterians or those found among dissenting bodies (e.g., Seceders and Covenanters).
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-In this chapter, Dodds raises some questions about certain theological views and assumptions held by Mr. Morton.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-In this chapter, Dodds makes several observations about Morton's complaints against those who are proponents of exclusive psalmody and dismantles them. Many of these continue to be used ad hominem today.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-In this chapter, Dodds examines whether or not Morton's criticisms of the 1650 Scottish Psalter are warranted or if they themselves can bear scrutiny.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-In this chapter, Dodds examines Morton's notions of human composure. He is alarmed because, if Morton is correct, there is no inspired Bible for English speakers because inspiration only pertains to the original languages and not to translations.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-In this chapter, Dodds carefully examines the chief arguments advanced by Morton against exclusive psalmody.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-In this chapter, Dodds gives a succinct answer to Morton's charge against Pressly for falsifying historical data on psalmody.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-Dodds notes, in his criticism upon the last chapter of Morton, that the opposition to exclusive psalmody, whatever its claims, has almost always ended in the practice of using exclusively an uninspired hymnody.
Read More1851-Robert J. Dodds (1824-1870).-Dodds reduces the arguments for exclusive psalmody to a series of propositions which he believes are really at the center of the issue and argues from them for exclusive psalmody.
Read More1918-Benjamin B. Warfield (1851-1921).-A masterful essay which explains why it is wrong to conclude from a few passages taken out of context that the final number of the saved will be meagre in comparison to the number of the lost.
Read More